vpn vs natd
From: Ilya (mail@krel.org)
Date: 03/08/01
- Next message: Jim Flowers: "Re: vpn vs natd"
- Previous message: Christopher Schulte: "Re: ipfw or ipf?"
- In reply to: Craig Danforth: "subscribe"
- Next in thread: Jim Flowers: "Re: vpn vs natd"
- Reply: Jim Flowers: "Re: vpn vs natd"
- Reply: Matt Piechota: "Re: vpn vs natd"
- Maybe reply: Jim Flowers: "Re: vpn vs natd"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Ilya" <mail@krel.org> To: <freebsd-security@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 20:48:42 -0500
As far as i know there is no way to make vpn work through many-to-one nat.
Only many-tomany will work. I currently have at home one-to-many (windows
clients through freebsd router), now that i need vpn, i got a second public
ip. Is it somehow possible to setup that all truffic from certin private ip
on my lan would go out as using my new ip? which i guess will reside on same
network card, whoch hosts current public ip. is it also possible to do
without breaking the config i have now?
so i am thinking, many-to-one nat for all windows clients except one, and
many-to-many for only one specific private ip.
how can i do it?
thx a lot.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Jim Flowers: "Re: vpn vs natd"
- Previous message: Christopher Schulte: "Re: ipfw or ipf?"
- In reply to: Craig Danforth: "subscribe"
- Next in thread: Jim Flowers: "Re: vpn vs natd"
- Reply: Jim Flowers: "Re: vpn vs natd"
- Reply: Matt Piechota: "Re: vpn vs natd"
- Maybe reply: Jim Flowers: "Re: vpn vs natd"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|