Re: bugtraq inetd DoS exploit *PFFT*
From: ryanb (ryanb@goddamn***.org)
Date: 03/07/01
- Next message: Q Yai QQ: "Re: bugtraq inetd DoS exploit *PFFT*"
- Previous message: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: TOS ipfw"
- In reply to: Nick Slager: "Re: bugtraq inetd DoS exploit *PFFT*"
- Next in thread: Q Yai QQ: "Re: bugtraq inetd DoS exploit *PFFT*"
- Reply: Q Yai QQ: "Re: bugtraq inetd DoS exploit *PFFT*"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 10:05:13 -0600 From: ryanb <ryanb@goddamn***.org> To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 11:51:51AM +1100, Nick Slager wrote:
> erm, thanks, I do realise this. The advantage of the -C flag is being
> able to specify the maximum times a given service can be invoked from a
> single IP, ensuring services are still available for other clients.
You can do that from inetd.conf as well.
nowait/<total children>/<total children per IP per minute>/
See inetd.conf(5) for more info.
- ryan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Q Yai QQ: "Re: bugtraq inetd DoS exploit *PFFT*"
- Previous message: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: TOS ipfw"
- In reply to: Nick Slager: "Re: bugtraq inetd DoS exploit *PFFT*"
- Next in thread: Q Yai QQ: "Re: bugtraq inetd DoS exploit *PFFT*"
- Reply: Q Yai QQ: "Re: bugtraq inetd DoS exploit *PFFT*"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]