Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-01:18.bind
From: Chris Johnson (cjohnson@palomine.net)
Date: 02/01/01
- Next message: Matt Dillon: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-01:18.bind"
- Previous message: Przemyslaw Frasunek: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-01:18.bind"
- In reply to: Przemyslaw Frasunek: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-01:18.bind"
- Next in thread: Matt Dillon: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-01:18.bind"
- Reply: Matt Dillon: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-01:18.bind"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 20:01:42 -0500 From: Chris Johnson <cjohnson@palomine.net> To: Przemyslaw Frasunek <venglin@freebsd.lublin.pl>
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 01:48:19AM +0100, Przemyslaw Frasunek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 11:55:18PM +0200, Roman Shterenzon wrote:
> > Why not make it default in the base system?
>
> The best workaround is not using BIND at all. Consider some alternatives,
> like /usr/ports/net/djbdns.
Yes! Why work around BIND limitiations and do all this sandboxing to try to
limit the damage it can do to you, when there's a better alternative?
Chris
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Matt Dillon: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-01:18.bind"
- Previous message: Przemyslaw Frasunek: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-01:18.bind"
- In reply to: Przemyslaw Frasunek: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-01:18.bind"
- Next in thread: Matt Dillon: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-01:18.bind"
- Reply: Matt Dillon: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-01:18.bind"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|