Re: bind8.2.3 - where is the correct place to download src?

From: Yuri A. Wolf (subs@ovk.altai.ru)
Date: 01/31/01 

Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:45:37 +0600 (NOVT)
From: "Yuri A. Wolf" <subs@ovk.altai.ru>
To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org

> > 1) where is the correct place of the port for FreeBSD-3.4?
>
> /usr/ports/net/bind8
;-)
i meant the place at ftp.freebsd.org where the port is. yesterday i
downloaded the new port (with patches of course), but there was an error
during patching (patch-ac). the sources were from ftp.isc.org, and i
putted them into distfiles, so there wasn't mistake as i think...

> > 2) if i have fresh src from ftp.isc.org (actually isrv4.pa.vix.com,
> > right?) then can i compile it without using patches in port collection?

> It works, but if you don't use the port then you can't uninstall it, etc.

so, if i do that, i don't need pathches located in ports, right? or?
 
> > and is there some changes about host ftp.FreeBSD.org? today my nslookup
> > don't see it from here althou i didn't any changes... can you
> > tell me the ip i can use instead?

> xor# host ftp.freebsd.org
> ftp.freebsd.org is a nickname for ftp.freesoftware.com
> ftp.freesoftware.com has address 216.66.64.162

strange... my named logs that:

Jan 31 08:54:10 proxy named[37568]: Lame server on 'ftp.freesoftware.com' (in 'FREESOFTWARE.COM'?): [207.90.181.81].53 'WHO2.CDROM.COM'
Jan 31 08:54:11 proxy named[37568]: Lame server on 'ftp.freesoftware.com' (in 'FREESOFTWARE.COM'?): [204.216.27.3].53 'WHO.CDROM.COM'
Jan 31 08:57:22 proxy named[37568]: ns_forw: query(ftp.freesoftware.com) All possible A RR's lame
Jan 31 09:04:51 proxy named[37568]: Lame server on 'ftp.freesoftware.com' (in 'FREESOFTWARE.COM'?): [204.216.27.3].53 'WHO.CDROM.COM'
Jan 31 09:04:52 proxy named[37568]: Lame server on 'ftp.freesoftware.com' (in 'FREESOFTWARE.COM'?): [207.90.181.81].53 'WHO2.CDROM.COM'
Jan 31 09:11:07 proxy named[37568]: ns_forw: query(ftp.freesoftware.com) All possible A RR's lame
Jan 31 09:23:36 proxy named[37568]: Lame server on 'ftp.freesoftware.com' (in 'FREESOFTWARE.COM'?): [207.90.181.81].53 'WHO2.CDROM.COM'
Jan 31 09:23:36 proxy named[37568]: Lame server on 'ftp.freesoftware.com' (in 'FREESOFTWARE.COM'?): [204.216.27.3].53 'WHO.CDROM.COM'

etc...

> Kris 

--
Yuri
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Cannot access a web page
    ... Could not open connection to the host on port 80 connect failed. ... Then you can use telnet to test with. ... > You can also use nslookup to check on your DNS. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6.browser)
  • Re: A new model for ports and kernel security?
    ... > functionality to what I was suggesting and I thank them for that. ... > - patches are not a real solution. ... if there is an urgent patch to the kernel then ... > try and grab the port and error if they can't get it. ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: Port 135
    ... With the RPC/DCOM patches applies, with the Microsoft test utility ... There are times were I don't have the firewall up because it gets in the way ... we don't have control over PORT 135? ...
    (microsoft.public.security)
  • Re: How regularly is the GnuPG source code examined?
    ... >> he thought my AES code which was a port of Rijmens was too slow despite ... not actual implementations for patches. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Rebuilding port
    ... by using patches provided by someone else. ... was successful, but in the case of vlc, the one that would be most ... and the patch is for 0.8.5. ... by trying to build the port for 0.8.5, ...
    (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)