nfsd lacks support for tcp_wrapper
From: Gerald Pfeifer (pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at)
Date: 01/31/01
- Next message: Alfred Perlstein: "Re: nfsd lacks support for tcp_wrapper"
- Previous message: Brian F. Feldman: "Re: PAM/SSH and KerberosIV?"
- Next in thread: Alfred Perlstein: "Re: nfsd lacks support for tcp_wrapper"
- Reply: Alfred Perlstein: "Re: nfsd lacks support for tcp_wrapper"
- Reply: Garrett Wollman: "nfsd lacks support for tcp_wrapper"
- Reply: Geoffrey T. Falk: "Re: nfsd lacks support for tcp_wrapper"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 02:10:19 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at> To: <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
Unless we completely missed something, nfsd does lack support for
tcp_wrapper, doesn't it?
As NFS is a rather critical security-wize this seems like a big omission.
(Many sites, like ours, just cannot avoid using NFS, so it would be nice
to be able to easily restrict the address range clients are allowed to
connect from.)
Or are we just missing something?
Gerald
-- Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Alfred Perlstein: "Re: nfsd lacks support for tcp_wrapper"
- Previous message: Brian F. Feldman: "Re: PAM/SSH and KerberosIV?"
- Next in thread: Alfred Perlstein: "Re: nfsd lacks support for tcp_wrapper"
- Reply: Alfred Perlstein: "Re: nfsd lacks support for tcp_wrapper"
- Reply: Garrett Wollman: "nfsd lacks support for tcp_wrapper"
- Reply: Geoffrey T. Falk: "Re: nfsd lacks support for tcp_wrapper"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|