Re: (no subject)
From: Thomas Cannon (root@noops.org)
Date: 01/30/01
- Next message: Kris Kennaway: "Security advisory SA-01:10.bind"
- Previous message: FreeBSD Security Advisories: "FreeBSD Ports Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-01:17.exmh2"
- In reply to: Kris Kennaway: "Re: (no subject)"
- Next in thread: FBSDSecure@aol.com: "Re: (no subject)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 01:26:46 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Cannon <root@noops.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
> > critical IPs are placed in the ignore file. The DNS and email
> > servers I did not consider, but they will be added. Thanks for the
> > tip.
>
> "It's too difficult", etc.
Firewall policy has a simple rule:
Deny all not allowed
When setting up something that will auto-ban hosts or networks, you need
the opposite of the firewall rule -- namely, to allow tings you don't
want banned. Surely you can see where I'm going. It's an obvious
conclusion, I'd think. It might be okay for a desktop machine, but nothing
more advanced....
Lest I sound like I'm picking on some vendor/writer of code... logcheck
rocks.
-tcannon
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Kris Kennaway: "Security advisory SA-01:10.bind"
- Previous message: FreeBSD Security Advisories: "FreeBSD Ports Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-01:17.exmh2"
- In reply to: Kris Kennaway: "Re: (no subject)"
- Next in thread: FBSDSecure@aol.com: "Re: (no subject)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]