Re: Antisniffer measures (digest of posts)
From: Robert Clark (res03db2@gte.net)
Date: 01/06/01
- Next message: John Howie: "Re: Antisniffer measures (digest of posts)"
- Previous message: Dan Nelson: "Re: Antisniffer measures (digest of posts)"
- In reply to: Artem Koutchine: "Antisniffer measures (digest of posts)"
- Next in thread: John Howie: "Re: Antisniffer measures (digest of posts)"
- Reply: John Howie: "Re: Antisniffer measures (digest of posts)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 15:46:01 -0800 From: Robert Clark <res03db2@gte.net> To: Artem Koutchine <matrix@ipform.ru>
I would look into the Intel Pro/100 S. (hardware assist 3DES
10/100 ethernet cards.)
The intel site has info, but here is a site with a price listed:
http://www.gotocol.com/inpro1brpcis.html
This isn't necessarily better a better solution than ipsec via software,
but it would not cause as much of a performance hit.
I wonder if token ring suffers from this problem? 100VG?
[RC]
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 10:51:36PM +0300, Artem Koutchine wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have reread all the followups on the questions i posted in the mid
> december.
>
> first:
>
> 50% of the people said "SWITCH TO SWITCHES", 50% of the
> people said: "EVEN SWITCHES CANNOT HELP"
>
> Then mostly everytone started talking about SNMP controllable
> switches with hardcorded MAC addreses for each port.
>
> Then people started to talk about static ARP entries on the host.
>
> ONE (ONLY ONE) person mentioned encryption, but did not elaborate
> on that.
>
> Well, let me remind the situtation. I have a very heterogenic network:
> FreeBSD, Linux, Win9x, WinME, WInNT, WIn2000. Now they are all
> connected with hubs, which allows sniffer to run and obtain all the mail
> and web password easily. I need to stop it.
>
> Buying 500$ SNMP controllable switch is CRAZY. I will not do it. It is
> way too expensive. It will cost us about 4000$.
>
> So, as I see we two possible solutions and one probable soultion:
>
> POSSIBLE N1:
> Switches (NON SNMP contrlllable, which do not turn into hub when flooded
> with MAC addresses), hardcorder ARP entries on hosts
> for router, DNS, MAIL, POP, corporate web (thanks hot it is the same host).
>
> QUESTIONS:
> Is it possible to do to hard code ARP entries in WINxxxxx?
> Is there such switch which does not fall back into hub mode when flooded
> with
> MACs?
>
> POSSIBLE N2:
> Install a little FBSD/LINUX based router indetad of each hub. Put a bunch
> of
> NIC in each. Put each host on a reparate NIC. Price: 100$ for the Pentium166
> based host+ 8nics x 20$=100+160=260$ (twice as cheap as SNMP switch and
> twice as expensive and a simple switch)
>
> QUESTIONS:
> I wonder where do i get 8 IRQs for the NICs int the routing box.
> Will the box with 4PCIs and 4ISA NICs be able to hold on electricwise?
>
> PROBABLE:
> Some kind of tranparent IP encryprtion.
>
> QUESTIONS:
> What kind of IP encryption?
> Is it availbale for FBSD, Linux, WINxxxxx?
>
>
> I hope someone would help.
>
> Best regards,
> Artem Koutchine
>
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: John Howie: "Re: Antisniffer measures (digest of posts)"
- Previous message: Dan Nelson: "Re: Antisniffer measures (digest of posts)"
- In reply to: Artem Koutchine: "Antisniffer measures (digest of posts)"
- Next in thread: John Howie: "Re: Antisniffer measures (digest of posts)"
- Reply: John Howie: "Re: Antisniffer measures (digest of posts)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|