Re: [fw-wiz] obscure email address formats
- From: Chuck Swiger <chuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 15:19:06 -0700
On May 23, 2011, at 1:30 PM, ArkanoiD wrote:
Is there any good reason to allow email addresses (in smtp, imap and alikes)
in any format different from mailbox@fqdn ?
There is plenty of other stuff defined in RFCs and I wonder if anyone really uses it so
I should *not* just filter it out.
People around these parts use address tags <user+mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> all of the time to attempt delivery to a particular mailbox (if it exists) rather than INBOX.
RFC-5322 discusses obsolete addressing and header formats and suggests how they should be handled. Nobody is likely to use explicit address routing nowadays, or UUCP !-paths, or headers with arbitrary amounts of whitespace between a header and the colon (ie, "Date : " rather than "Date: ").
Regards,
--
-Chuck
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- References:
- [fw-wiz] obscure email address formats
- From: ArkanoiD
- [fw-wiz] obscure email address formats
- Prev by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] obscure email address formats
- Next by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] obscure email address formats
- Previous by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] obscure email address formats
- Next by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] obscure email address formats
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|