Re: [fw-wiz] IPv6
- From: sai <sonicsai@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 07:25:52 +0500
Why would you want to NAT66?
On 12/27/10, Roger Marquis <marquis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Paul D. Robertson wrote:_______________________________________________
Is anyone doing anything interesting with v6 and firewalls? We're
supposedly coming up on the year that v6 will break out, and most
organizations I know still don't even route it.
We're not allowing IPv6 through any firewalls (that I know of) until gear
that'll do NAT66, NAT64, and NAT46 becomes available.
Roger Marquis
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [fw-wiz] IPv6
- From: Mathew Want
- Re: [fw-wiz] IPv6
- References:
- Re: [fw-wiz] IPv6
- From: Roger Marquis
- Re: [fw-wiz] IPv6
- Prev by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] IPv6
- Next by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] IPv6
- Previous by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] IPv6
- Next by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] IPv6
- Index(es):