Re: [fw-wiz] SCADA
- From: "Behm, Jeff" <jbehm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:42:46 -0500
On Wednesday, April 15, 2009 2:59 PM, Chris Blask said:
Daniel E. Hassler <hassler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I agree with your observations but how can an insecure system be
considered reliable?
That there is a damn fine question, but when you ask it of the folks
running these systems the answer is: "It has been reliable so far."
And to that one should respond:
"...because they haven't been connected up to the rest of the network."
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [fw-wiz] SCADA
- From: Chris Blask
- Re: [fw-wiz] SCADA
- References:
- Re: [fw-wiz] SCADA
- From: Daniel E. Hassler
- Re: [fw-wiz] SCADA
- From: Chris Blask
- Re: [fw-wiz] SCADA
- From: Daniel E. Hassler
- Re: [fw-wiz] SCADA
- From: Chris Blask
- Re: [fw-wiz] SCADA
- Prev by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] SCADA
- Next by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] SCADA
- Previous by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] SCADA
- Next by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] SCADA
- Index(es):