Re: [fw-wiz] SCADA
- From: "Daniel E. Hassler" <hassler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:26:38 -0700
Forgive my ignorance but why is SCADA even allowed to run on a Windows host? IMHO - when industry insists (i.e. $$$ on the table) on secure alternatives can and will become available.
Remote SCADA logging can be done securely over the Internet with authentication, confidentiality, integrity, and non-repudiation. Delays can happen but data will never be lost. It's a one way street from device(s) to logger(s).
Real-time SCADA control should be confined to a LAN/intranet where complete network/power redundancy and backup systems are also controlled by the site. The Internet is not 100% reliable for real-time control (e.g. San Jose area last week). I did not lose any log data. I lost visibility of a couple of systems for a while. When the connection came back the missed data points were filled in - as designed.
I'm not trolling - I'm actively solving these problems and welcome comments from those who are also.
Sincerely,
Dan Hassler
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [fw-wiz] SCADA
- From: Marcus J. Ranum
- Re: [fw-wiz] SCADA
- From: Chris Blask
- Re: [fw-wiz] SCADA
- Prev by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] SCADA
- Next by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] SCADA
- Previous by thread: [fw-wiz] Who stay focused? (was: [Fwd: Question])
- Next by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] SCADA
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|