Re: [fw-wiz] 10Gb Firewalls
- From: Kerry Milestone <km4@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:17:40 +0100
Thanks very much for your replies, its given me some useful information on devices.
>If you're looking at running a consolidated SAN between a number of
>"limited" systems you've merely shifted your risk from IP/network to
>disk/SAN. Who's to say you couldn't get someone trying to elevate >their level of access via the fiber-channel medium versus breaking >through the Ethernet layer?
How serious is this? I haven't heard of too many. This would then become an issue of the carrier security correct?
I assume then, that the encapsulation of a private channel through a backbone is brought into question? I really wouldn't think to put this kind of traffic through IPSec due to the overhead.
Other than that, I guess the theories for firewalling are the same whether it be 100Mb or 10Gb - the device just needs to handle it.
Cheers.
--
The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE. _______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- References:
- Re: [fw-wiz] IPSEC VPN: Sidewinder >-< Nortel compatible?
- From: Bill Stout
- Re: [fw-wiz] IPSEC VPN: Sidewinder >-< Nortel compatible?
- From: Chris Myers
- [fw-wiz] 10Gb Firewalls
- From: Kerry Milestone
- Re: [fw-wiz] IPSEC VPN: Sidewinder >-< Nortel compatible?
- Prev by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] 10Gb Firewalls
- Previous by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] 10Gb Firewalls
- Next by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] IPSEC VPN: Sidewinder >-< Nortel compatible?
- Index(es):