Re: [fw-wiz] syslog and network management
- From: Alejandro Ezequiel Fernández Preda <quequiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:36:00 -0200
Nad,
Depending on the size of the network and the logging level used, a central
syslog can be a very busy server. I wouldn't add Cisco Works (which is
another resource hog) on the same machine, as it could lead on syslog
message loss under heavy traffic conditions. You should check the
documentation of your syslog server on how to dimension the machine running
it, specially if it will be logging to a SQL database
Regards,
Alejandro
----- Original Message -----
From: "shadow floating" <nadengine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Firewall Wizards Security Mailing List"
<firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 6:51 PM
Subject: Re: [fw-wiz] syslog and network management
thanks alot patrick, i was not actually asking about the centralized
log server issue as i believe in it...but is it appropriate to add
firewall and router management applications to be installed onto that
server , like ciscoworks and the like?..or it's better to add another
separate management machine in addition to the syslog machine from the
security point of view
thanks alot
Nad
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- References:
- [fw-wiz] syslog and network management
- From: shadow floating
- Re: [fw-wiz] syslog and network management
- From: Darden, Patrick S.
- Re: [fw-wiz] syslog and network management
- From: shadow floating
- [fw-wiz] syslog and network management
- Prev by Date: [fw-wiz] Firewall Placement Question
- Next by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall Placement Question
- Previous by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] syslog and network management
- Next by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] syslog and network management
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|