Re: [fw-wiz] Enforcing content filtering with PIX515E



Has anybody got ICAP working with PIX or Cisco content engine and
Surfcontrol? If this worked wouldnt it be the best solution?

-----Original Message-----
From: firewall-wizards-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:firewall-wizards-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
Victor Williams
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 8:41 PM
To: Firewall Wizards Security Mailing List
Cc: firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [fw-wiz] Enforcing content filtering with PIX515E


The simplest way to get SurfControl to example all packets headed to and
through your firewall is to put both your firewall and the surfcontrol
server on the same hub. SurfControl will automatically see all traffic
and make decisions on it accordingly.

If you have a switched network, depending on your switching fabric, you
should be able to set up port mirroring on the port SurfControl is
running on, and set it to mirror the port that the PIX is plugged into.

If you do have SurfControl licensed, you should have access by default
to their knowledgebase where they cover this in at least 4 different
articles.

Redirecting traffic from port 80 won't work...because the traffic will
get to the SurfControl server, but how in turn will the SurfControl
server then tell the traffic to proceed to the internet where it's
supposed to go, when that traffic is then going to be told to be sent
right back to the SurfControl server (itself) again? You're going to
get an infinite loop going there.

Also, just to clarify, SurfControl isn't a content filter. It's a URL
and port/protocol filter. It doesn't examine the full content/packets
of anything. It looks at how, say, a URL is classified as, and chooses
to allow or deny it based on your rules. It doesn't look at the content
of anything but it's own database of URLs, and decides how to process
your request.

Ian Rarity wrote:
Hi all,

Apologies if this is dumb, obvious or both, but I've never had to get a
firewall to do this before. We've just signed up with SurfControl to
provide us with content filtering for our web users.
Actually getting all the various versions of various browsers on our
network to use it as their proxy server is proving problematic; each
version of IE seems to store the proxy URL in a different registry key.
Also, thanks to our IT policy (or lack thereof), there's not much we can
do to prevent users simply removing the proxy setting in their browsers
and looking at whatever sites they please.
So I thought I'd try reconfiguring our firewall to send any outgoing
traffic on port 80 to the IP/port that SurfControl gave us. The
access-list for the inside interface on the PIX currently reads:

access-list acl_in permit icmp any any
access-list acl_in permit ip any any

In other words, anything on the inside interface is allowed to access
anywhere. Am I right in thinking that to force outgoing port 80 traffic
in the direction of SurfControl, I'd need to add a line to acl_in along
these lines:

access-list acl_in permit any host 80 <surfcontrol's IP> 8081

Would this suffice, or do I need something more involved?

Thanks,
Ian.

*********************************
Ian Rarity
Technical Engineer
ESPC (UK) Ltd.



*******************************************************************
Private and Confidential: This e-mail transmission is strictly
confidential and intended solely for the addressee. It may contain
privileged and confidential information and if you are not the
intended recipient, you must not copy, disclose, distribute or
take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this
e-mail in error, please delete it and notify our E-mail Systems
Administrator on +44 (0) 131 624 8000. ESPC (UK) Ltd does not
accept any liability for any harm that may be caused to the
recipient's system or data by this message or any attachment.

ESPC (UK) Ltd is a company registered under the Companies
Acts in Scotland (Registered Number SC203535), and having its
registered office at 90A George Street, Edinburgh, Midlothian
EH2 3DF.

ESPC (UK) Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial
Services Authority.
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards



_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards

_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards



Relevant Pages

  • Re: [fw-wiz] Enforcing content filtering with PIX515E
    ... through your firewall is to put both your firewall and the surfcontrol ... should be able to set up port mirroring on the port SurfControl is ... get to the SurfControl server, but how in turn will the SurfControl ...
    (Firewall-Wizards)
  • Re: port 21 blocked by firewall
    ... admins to report on internet usage, maintain logs of all users' activity, ... > Connected to 209.1.225.192 port 21 ... > 421 Access Denied by SurfControl ... > I don't care if I use FTP or any other mean, I just want to upload. ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: Outgoing mail problem. Telnet issue?
    ... as being ok is sent on to exchange on port 26. ... exchange pushes it to SurfControl which then sends out. ... SurfControl and Exchange sit on the same server. ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
  • Re: SBS Prem on dual homed system HELP
    ... is server. ... > "chris landman" wrote in message ... I opened the 443 port and was not able to connect. ... >> a PIX and I heard that it can be stopping the traffic. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Cisco 501 Configuration help.
    ... :I am new to the CISCO IOS, need help configuring a 501 pix firewall. ... :On the lan segment I have 6 machines that need to connect to a server ... :service running on port 6666. ... in the second configuration, the PIX will PAT ...
    (comp.dcom.sys.cisco)