Re: [fw-wiz] Anyone have any informed opinions on the watchguardproduct line?
- From: Chris Myers <clmmacunix@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 16:41:23 -0600
Sorry, I think i sent this without completing the thought. Go for it
with a small business. It is easy administration. The Core series VPN
is much easier to impliment. The SOHO Edge Series VPN is a little
obscure, but anyone who cannot afford MSS ( Manage Security Services)
or a dedicated Security Person, the box works very well.
Hope this helps:)
On Jan 1, 2008, at 11:20 AM, Jim Seymour wrote:
"Paul D. Robertson" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Personally, I'm finding the Windows-only GUI more and more of a
I've never liked GUI-only administration. IME, some operations are
well-suited to the GUI, some better-suited to a command-line and
Suddenly, if I want to make rule changes, I've got to boot up
and XP- normally that takes getting out an external drive and
other apps I'm working on to free up enough memory on my MacBook.
I don't even routinely use an i86-based system. My home machine
is a Sparc Solaris box. At work I'm on a Sparc Solaris box. If they
weren't Sparc Solaris boxen, they'd be '86-based 'nix systems of one
flavour or another.
I have a work-provided '86-based laptop that dual-boots Ubuntu Linux
and WinXP. The only time I run WinXP is in testing-out new/upgrade
app deployments for the desktops, or trouble-shooting an issue for an
end-user. MS-Win is only used for *one* network administrative
purpose: A "toy" RAS we have that has only a MS-Win GUI admin tool.
(*I* never would have bought it--it came as the result of a business
acquisition and I haven't been able to justify the cost of replacing
with more suitable network hardware.)
there any chance we'll see either a cross-plaform, command-line or
Web-based GUI any time soon?
That might put Watchguard back on my list of solutions for
consideration--when the time came.
I remove network infrastructure products from consideration
if they have only a MS-Windows-based GUI administration facility. In
fact: I tend to avoid products that are limited to GUI-based
administration. I'm a belt-and-suspenders kind of a guy. I like to
retain the ability to log in via dialup and telnet to my network
hardware. If an Internet connection dies I can still get in and deal
with my networks. If a WAN circuit dies I can still access the remote
location and trouble-shoot the problem from both ends. Etc.
Efficiently. Without the overhead of IP-over-creaky-dialup.
Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam
filtering. If you reply to this email and your email is
rejected, please accept my apologies and let me know via my
web form at <http://jimsun.linxnet.com/contact/scform.php>.
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards mailing list
- Prev by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] Anyone have any informed opinions on the watchguardproduct line?
- Next by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] firewall-wizards Digest, Vol 20, Issue 13
- Previous by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] Anyone have any informed opinions on the watchguardproduct line?
- Next by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] firewall-wizards Digest, Vol 20, Issue 13