I'm evaluating an existing VPN infrastructure, and am looking at replacement options that can support IPSEC and SSL.
Currently VPN appliances are used for site-site and remote access. One of the options is to make use of the VPN capabilties of existing (SYN/ACK semantic type) firewalls.
What is the current opinion of adding more services to a firewall vs. deploying standalone VPN appliances?
Also, what is the current best practice as far as controlling who can get to what via the VPN? (e.g.contractors, vendors)
Re: Router-to-router VPN ... Have made sucessful router to router vpn connection - great! ... For use to traveling laptops that vpn to the server. ... "firewall" is acting as the VPN Server and that the VPN Server is not behind ... terminating at the firewalls which is not the same thing. ... (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)
Re: AD Consolidation Question ... Each forest represents a seperate location across the US and there are ... by firewalls and replication over firewalls, ... If you use a VPN and don't filter on those VPN interfaces the info on ... (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
Re: AD Consolidation Question ...BLOG --> http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/default.aspx ... Each forest represents a seperate location across the US and there are ... by firewalls and replication over firewalls, ... If you use a VPN and don't filter on those VPN interfaces the info on ... (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
RE: Firewalls on VPNs - Best Practice Advice ... | Subject: RE: Firewalls on VPNs - Best Practice Advice ... | Microsoft Online Partner Support... | | I use the PC for connecting to various remote networks via VPN.... | | connections is not recommended, ... (microsoft.public.windowsxp.work_remotely)
