Re: [fw-wiz] Firewalls that generate new packets..



You're right that there has been a great deal of convergence and feature
parity development between PIX/ASA and the IOS and CatOS Firewalls.
This, again, is "on purpose." It's part of Cisco's position that
security and risk reduction are better when the disparate parts of your
security and network solutions work together.

A plan in progress (and yes, I've been here for ten years and am pretty
sure we have had, and continue to have a strategy) means that at any
moment in time you are only going to see what's available then. That's
why the positioning and messaging evolves over time. At one time, we had
two distinct solutions (later, three with the CatOS FWSM.) As the
firewall market matured and as we were able to add additional
intelligence into both the network and our security solutions, there was
a planned convergence between the various solutions, with the end game
being that any customer could select the solution (or more often,
combination of solutions) that was right for their organization, and
still have the same level of security combined with flexibility and
interoperability.

It's not quite the same thing, IMO, as just managing to not "screw it
up."

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul D. Robertson [mailto:paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 8:14 AM
To: Chris Blask
Cc: Firewall Wizards Security Mailing List; Paul Melson; Bill McGee
(bam)
Subject: Re: [fw-wiz] Firewalls that generate new packets..

On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Chris Blask wrote:

technical and marketing aspects of such things. It is
therefore also quite defensibly true what Bill said: <sic>
"That is on purpose".

This is the part I have serious troubles with- "on purpose" implies that

it was a pre-planned, thought-out event, not that you just didn't screw
it
up by not doing anything[1]. The code bases _started out differently_
for
no reason other than the fact that the products were from different
companies, on two different platforms. To paint that fact as if it were

some sort of strategic plan does the readers of this list a disservice.

PS - Paul R, my posts seem to again not be making the list,

The list is still moderated, it takes the moderator some time to get
through the queue...

Paul
[1] From what I recall when Cisco was repeatedly trying to get me to
buy
in to the fact that PIX should be on my list of approved firewalls at
Gannett, one of the points they kept trying to make was that PIX was
getting more IOS features to make it easier for folks to deal with a
single interface- so it would seem to me that even the keeping them
apart
wasn't necessarily a planned event.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
Paul D. Robertson "My statements in this message are personal
opinions
paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx which may have no basis whatsoever in fact."
http://www.fluiditgroup.com/blog/pdr/
Art: http://PaulDRobertson.imagekind.com/
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards



Relevant Pages

  • Re: [fw-wiz] Firewalls that generate new packets..
    ... parity development between PIX/ASA and the IOS and CatOS Firewalls. ... security and network solutions work together. ... It was also Cisco's position at one point that IOS uber alles should be ... You start with an apple you bought from a friend and an orange you grew ...
    (Firewall-Wizards)
  • Re: Defense in Depth
    ... What is meant by "layers" of security, is this: the entry points that must be ... Physical Layer - Physical access to the resources. ... attacks and other attacks that go after the software itself. ... "layer" in one long chain (lots of firewalls). ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • RE: Wireless Security for Home Users
    ... for most home users to create and/or manage 2 firewalls and a DMZ. ... As with most network security, ... investigate additional security features available from the WAP ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • RE: [Full-Disclosure] RE: MS SQL WORM IS DESTROYING INTERNET BLOCK PORT 1434!
    ... > 1) I don't trust MS products for security related tasks. ... firewalls running on NT? ... necessary steps to mitigate the risk and protect yourself. ... We still had six boxes hit. ...
    (Full-Disclosure)
  • RE: IDS is dead, etc
    ... Most firewall logs are just as tough to decipher as IDSs. ... Automated security analytics is a tough animal I don't care what the system. ... firewalls and IDSs, not just IDSs. ... There is no solution to these problems, therefore IDS is dead and we ...
    (Focus-IDS)

Quantcast