Re: [fw-wiz] 2nd Life
- From: ArkanoiD <ark@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 18:03:16 +0300
Virtualization is proven to be not safe, as virtual device drivers are
not written with security in mind. So the physical separation (remember,
"VLAN is not a security feature") does the thing proper and seems to be
the only solution.
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 08:19:56PM +0100, Matej wrote:
-a bastian host is a good idea, but I would suggest a Linux server for
the setup, that might reduce your hardware costs
-the best way to open those ports, would be to restrict them by source
and destination addresses (in the example we narow down the scope)
My idea:
You could use a virtualization product. I had some positive
experiance.
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- References:
- [fw-wiz] 2nd Life
- From: DRISCOLL, ROBERT
- Re: [fw-wiz] 2nd Life
- From: Brian Loe
- Re: [fw-wiz] 2nd Life
- From: Timothy Shea
- Re: [fw-wiz] 2nd Life
- From: Brian Loe
- Re: [fw-wiz] 2nd Life
- From: Matej
- [fw-wiz] 2nd Life
- Prev by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] FYI: DDOS services for sale...
- Next by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] FYI: DDOS services for sale...
- Previous by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] 2nd Life
- Next by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] 2nd Life
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|