Re: [fw-wiz] NAT sanity check
- From: James <jimbob.coffey@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 11:49:53 +1100
On 11/2/07, David Steele <steeled3@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
I'm hoping someone can provide a sanity check on the following configuration
- i.e.: will it work?
I've got a /29 public network, addresses (say) .2 to .6, with default
gateway of .1. Can I place a Checkpoint firewall on .2 and have it use the
remaining addresses for NAT'd services on the other side of the firewall?
Yes not a problem use static arps on the firewall (cisco calls it proxy arp)
fw-1 will automagically create them for you as well but there have been issues
with this in the past (depends on OS and firewall revision)
I ask as I'm certain I've done this in the past, but I'm a few years out of
doing firewall work and my current technical contact reckons this won't work
- that the default gate will ARP for the address and the .2 firewall won't
respond; and that furthermore the only way to use the addresses would be to
put a different subnet between the default gateway and the firewall and
route the /29 network to the firewall (which I agree will work, but...)
Hmm time for a new technical contact...
I actually prefer the route based method but then I have address space
to burn a
/30 on.
Also, would it work if the firewall was a PIX?
Should do. I think the pix will even create them for you
if you configure nat rules.
TIA
--
_______________________________
David Steele
<insert sig line witticism here>
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
--
jac
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- References:
- [fw-wiz] NAT sanity check
- From: David Steele
- [fw-wiz] NAT sanity check
- Prev by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] NAT sanity check
- Next by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] NAT sanity check
- Previous by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] NAT sanity check
- Next by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] NAT sanity check
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|