Re: [fw-wiz] ***SPAM*** Re: IPv6 support in firewalls
- From: ArkanoiD <ark@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 22:51:14 +0400
I think the real reason behind that is not to have those machines in
"routable space" but just to avoid collisions when you merge big networks
(ever seen megring two companies both using 10/8? it's just a nightmare ;-)
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 09:30:45AM +0200, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
Yes, I think "official" registered address space for every single
node, PC, mobile phone, fridge, coffee machine, ... _is_ the
ultimate goal and one of the major reasons to deploy IPv6.
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [fw-wiz] ***SPAM*** Re: IPv6 support in firewalls
- From: Dave Piscitello
- Re: [fw-wiz] ***SPAM*** Re: IPv6 support in firewalls
- References:
- [fw-wiz] New to Cisco PIX/ ASA
- From: Keith A. Glass
- [fw-wiz] IPv6 support in firewalls
- From: Dave Piscitello
- Re: [fw-wiz] IPv6 support in firewalls
- From: Marcus J. Ranum
- Re: [fw-wiz] IPv6 support in firewalls
- From: Darren Reed
- Re: [fw-wiz] IPv6 support in firewalls
- From: Marcus J. Ranum
- [fw-wiz] ***SPAM*** Re: IPv6 support in firewalls
- From: Dave Piscitello
- Re: [fw-wiz] IPv6 support in firewalls
- From: Patrick M. Hausen
- [fw-wiz] ***SPAM*** Re: IPv6 support in firewalls
- From: Dave Piscitello
- Re: [fw-wiz] ***SPAM*** Re: IPv6 support in firewalls
- From: Patrick M. Hausen
- [fw-wiz] New to Cisco PIX/ ASA
- Prev by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] Query: Why bother with an application proxy over stateful packet filtering?
- Next by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] IPv6 support in firewalls
- Previous by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] ***SPAM*** Re: IPv6 support in firewalls
- Next by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] ***SPAM*** Re: IPv6 support in firewalls
- Index(es):