Re: [fw-wiz] Query: Why bother with an application proxy over stateful packet filtering?
- From: "Patrick M. Hausen" <hausen@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:58:18 +0200
Hi, Will,
I am wondering why would the be a need to web up a proxy such as a web
proxy (Squid) instead of just using a stateful packet filtering firewall
(iptables) only in a network?
I suggest you start by reading these two papers for an answer:
http://www.avolio.com/papers/apgw+spf.html
http://www.securecomputing.com/webform.cfm?id=123
The latter requires one-time registration to download,
so Secure Computing can send you sp^H^Himportant security
related information.
Kind regards,
Patrick M. Hausen
Leiter Netzwerke und Sicherheit
--
punkt.de GmbH * Vorholzstr. 25 * 76137 Karlsruhe
Tel. 0721 9109 0 * Fax 0721 9109 100
info@xxxxxxxx http://www.punkt.de
Gf: Jürgen Egeling AG Mannheim 108285
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- References:
- [fw-wiz] Query: Why bother with an application proxy over stateful packet filtering?
- From: william fitzgerald
- [fw-wiz] Query: Why bother with an application proxy over stateful packet filtering?
- Prev by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] IPv6 support in firewalls
- Next by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] Query: Why bother with an application proxy over stateful packet filtering?
- Previous by thread: [fw-wiz] Query: Why bother with an application proxy over stateful packet filtering?
- Next by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] Query: Why bother with an application proxy over stateful packet filtering?
- Index(es):