Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall scaling
- From: sin <sin@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:57:41 +0300
Sami Ghourabi wrote:
Hi List,
I'm trying to convince management that a firewall that supports 32000
concurrent sessions is enough for an organization that has a single WAN
internet link, and about 60-100 users, but I'm lacking arguments.
it depends very much what the traffic pattern for those users is.
it's not that hard to generate 32k connections with 100 pcs :)
What do you think about that statement? Are there any rational methods_______________________________________________
available for firewall performance scaling (concurrent sessions, new
sessions per second, throughput, etc.)
Any answer/resource appreciated.
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall scaling
- From: jason
- Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall scaling
- References:
- [fw-wiz] Firewall scaling
- From: Sami Ghourabi
- [fw-wiz] Firewall scaling
- Prev by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall scaling
- Next by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall scaling
- Previous by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall scaling
- Next by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall scaling
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|