Re: [fw-wiz] Fw: Update on 1720/1863 (was: Re: OT? New compromise.)
- From: jseymour@xxxxxxxxxxx (Jim Seymour)
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:02:30 -0400 (EDT)
"R. DuFresne" <dufresne@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
Was the offending vendor named ...
It was, to me, privately. Unfortunately, I am under a "gentleman's
NDA." All I am at liberty to disclose has been disclosed.
Jim
--
Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam
filtering. If you reply to this email and your email is
rejected, please accept my apologies and let me know via my
web form at <http://jimsun.linxnet.com/contact/scform.php>.
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- References:
- Re: [fw-wiz] Fw: Update on 1720/1863 (was: Re: OT? New compromise.)
- From: R. DuFresne
- Re: [fw-wiz] Fw: Update on 1720/1863 (was: Re: OT? New compromise.)
- Prev by Date: [fw-wiz] H323 NAT problems with A Cyberguard.
- Next by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] Reporting Server
- Previous by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] Fw: Update on 1720/1863 (was: Re: OT? New compromise.)
- Next by thread: [fw-wiz] Reporting Server
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
