Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall bake-off?
- From: "Jim MacLeod" <jmacleod@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 09:59:03 -0700
On 3/20/07, Zachary Grafton <chaotic.chowder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well, the greatest thing about the sidewinder is how easy it is to
configure things. It does have clustering and nice failover features,
which are in my opinion, extremely important. If you are worried about
performance with a Sidewinder, just buy another one and cluster them.
Does it support active-active load splitting? Or do you need an
external load balancer for that? How destructive is the transition
when one fails? How extensive is the state sync? Will it scale to
n+1, or is it limited to 2 firewalls?
Thanks,
-Jim
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall bake-off?
- From: K K
- Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall bake-off?
- From: Patrick M. Hausen
- Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall bake-off?
- From: Zachary Grafton
- Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall bake-off?
- References:
- [fw-wiz] Firewall bake-off?
- From: James Hampton
- Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall bake-off?
- From: joel l huebner
- Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall bake-off?
- From: K K
- Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall bake-off?
- From: Zachary Grafton
- [fw-wiz] Firewall bake-off?
- Prev by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall bake-off?
- Next by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall bake-off?
- Previous by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall bake-off?
- Next by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall bake-off?
- Index(es):