Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall bake-off?
- From: Zachary Grafton <chaotic.chowder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:42:34 -0400
Well, the greatest thing about the sidewinder is how easy it is to
configure things. It does have clustering and nice failover features,
which are in my opinion, extremely important. If you are worried about
performance with a Sidewinder, just buy another one and cluster them.
Zack Grafton
K K wrote:
Any organization deploying firewalls needs to know their own comfort
level and requirements, and choose the solution which is right for
them.
On 3/15/07, joel l huebner <jhuebner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
My vote would be SecureComputing's Sidewinder product line...
Very SECURE, very easy to use!
But not exactly know as speed demons, and no published 64-byte PPS
throughput benchmarks.
That's not saying the Sidewinder products are not effective security,
just that the security of application proxy deep-inspection gateways
comes at a price.
Kevin Kadow
--
Moderator, unofficial Sidewinder Users group
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sidewinder-users/
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall bake-off?
- From: Jim MacLeod
- Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall bake-off?
- References:
- [fw-wiz] Firewall bake-off?
- From: James Hampton
- Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall bake-off?
- From: joel l huebner
- Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall bake-off?
- From: K K
- [fw-wiz] Firewall bake-off?
- Prev by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] Firewal with SSH inspection? (was Re: Firewall bake-off?)
- Next by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall bake-off?
- Previous by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall bake-off?
- Next by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall bake-off?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|