Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall bake-off?
- From: "James Hampton" <james.hampton@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 08:46:04 -0400
Ya I know, or at least throughput numbers with Basic Smart Defense
settings enabled!
On 3/13/07, Carson Gaspar <carson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
James Hampton wrote:_______________________________________________
I need to upgrade my current firewall solution, I currently use
Checkpoint but I have concerns about there long term future, pluse
there support and documentation are sorely lacking. I have used
Cisco's ASA's, but they lack a mature central management solution. Has
anyone done any serious bake-offs between ASA,Check Point and Juniper?
I have, but it's been several years since I did so. At the time, Juniper
ate the other 2 for lunch. But Cisco, at least, has definitely improved
since then. I have seen nothing on the Checkpoint side to change my
opinion of them (just try and get them to give you 64-byte PPS
throughput numbers - I dare ya').
--
Carson
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- References:
- [fw-wiz] Firewall bake-off?
- From: James Hampton
- Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall bake-off?
- From: Carson Gaspar
- [fw-wiz] Firewall bake-off?
- Prev by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall bake-off?
- Next by Date: [fw-wiz] Does dns proxy on NetScreen 5xx support reverse dns lookups
- Previous by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall bake-off?
- Next by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall bake-off?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
