Re: [fw-wiz] Cisco 2811 vs. ASA 55xx
- From: "Jerry Gardner" <sodaant@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 09:28:02 -0700
On 10/23/06, Victor Williams <vbwilliams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Cisco ASA units are the replacements/upgrades for the PIX.
However, I would like the original author to clarify/justify this
statement:
"Is the lack of flexibility of the ASA justified by the higher performance?
"
I don't have my list in front of me, but one thing I remember is that
the PIX/ASA DHCP support doesn't support reservations by MAC address.
There are others,
but I can't recall them offhand.
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- References:
- Re: [fw-wiz] Cisco 2811 vs. ASA 55xx
- From: Richard Golodner
- Re: [fw-wiz] Cisco 2811 vs. ASA 55xx
- From: Victor Williams
- Re: [fw-wiz] Cisco 2811 vs. ASA 55xx
- Prev by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] Cisco 2811 vs. ASA 55xx
- Next by Date: [fw-wiz] rule uid in log of CheckPoint
- Previous by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] Cisco 2811 vs. ASA 55xx
- Next by thread: [fw-wiz] rule uid in log of CheckPoint
- Index(es):