Re: [fw-wiz] Integrated IDS/IPS/Firewall (Cisco ASA and Juniper ISG)
- From: George Capehart <capegeo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 19:44:09 -0400
Robert A Beken wrote:
I have a question for the group about this new trend of using a single
firewall for all IDS and Firewall related tasks in an integrated box for
enterprise organizations (not SOHO). I personally think it's a bad idea
and lacks flexibility in configuration and "defense in depth" posture
towards security. What are other people's thoughts?
IMHO, single points of failure are /*NEVER*/ appropriate. In the part
of the world from which I come, we even use firewalls from two different
vendors on the internet-facing side and the internal-facing sides of a
DMZ. On my home network I run two different firewalls, have two
different AV packages on each machine, HIDS and firewalls on each
machine, two different anti-adware and two different anti-spyware
packages on each of the Windoze boxes. No single vendor can ever cover
all the bases of any one "anti-", much less do it all . . . The idea of
using "an integrated solution" runs counter to everything we've been
doing in the "defense in depth" space . . .
FWIW.
/g
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- References:
- [fw-wiz] Integrated IDS/IPS/Firewall (Cisco ASA and Juniper ISG)
- From: Robert A Beken
- [fw-wiz] Integrated IDS/IPS/Firewall (Cisco ASA and Juniper ISG)
- Prev by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] Integrated IDS/IPS/Firewall (Cisco ASA and Juniper ISG)
- Next by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] Integrated IDS/IPS/Firewall (Cisco ASA and Juniper ISG)
- Previous by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] Integrated IDS/IPS/Firewall (Cisco ASA and Juniper ISG)
- Next by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] Integrated IDS/IPS/Firewall (Cisco ASA and Juniper ISG)
- Index(es):