Re: [fw-wiz] Integrated IDS/IPS/Firewall (Cisco ASA and Juniper ISG)
- From: ArkanoiD <ark@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 17:08:24 +0400
nuqneH,
Actually Cisco ASA (don't have expirience with Juniper) is not a "single box".
Think it as PIX with IDS box with some kind of proprietary network interface
between them (actually it does even have MAC address ;-).
I don't like CISCO IDS though (and PIX itself is not much better, both
are functionally impaired) ,
but using products from the same vendor provides some management and
reporting unification that may be considered major advantage.
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 11:11:56AM -0500, Robert A Beken wrote:
I have a question for the group about this new trend of using a single_______________________________________________
firewall for all IDS and Firewall related tasks in an integrated box for
enterprise organizations (not SOHO). I personally think it's a bad idea
and lacks flexibility in configuration and "defense in depth" posture
towards security. What are other people's thoughts?
Thanks and Regards,
Robert Beken CISSP, GCFW
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- References:
- [fw-wiz] Integrated IDS/IPS/Firewall (Cisco ASA and Juniper ISG)
- From: Robert A Beken
- [fw-wiz] Integrated IDS/IPS/Firewall (Cisco ASA and Juniper ISG)
- Prev by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] Integrated IDS/IPS/Firewall (Cisco ASA and Juniper ISG)
- Next by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] Integrated IDS/IPS/Firewall (Cisco ASA and Juniper ISG)
- Previous by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] Integrated IDS/IPS/Firewall (Cisco ASA and Juniper ISG)
- Next by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] Integrated IDS/IPS/Firewall (Cisco ASA and Juniper ISG)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|