Re: [fw-wiz] Appropriate PIX logging level


On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 10:24:31AM -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote:
ArkanoiD wrote:
Well, does that mean that syslog should be either not reliable (generic
datagram), not portable enough (sdsc), buggy (nsyslogd) or suffering
performance problems (ng) ;-)?

You can get reliable logging with a stock BSD-flavor syslogd if you talk to
it via a named pipe (ie, /var/run/log or equivalent).

No, BSD syslog is not reliable since it is datagram socket.
And there still is no reliable kernel logging at all.

firewall-wizards mailing list