Re: [fw-wiz] Info Request: Looking for alternatives in HA/Load balancing firewallsthat are also scalable and modular. . .
- From: Oliver Humpage <oliver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2006 22:12:44 +0100
On 8/4/06 12:52 am, "David Lang" <dlang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
5TB/day is a sustained 60MB/sec (1 1/2 DS-3's or so), given that you have
a lot of peaks it's reasonable to say that your peak traffic is 2-3x that
value. you are still talking about ~200Mb/sec of traffic.
Is that not 200MB/sec = 1600Mb/sec? I.e. you either need to load balance, or
get a box with >1Gbps ports in it?
Oliver.
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: RE: [fw-wiz] the infamous "static" versus "nat"
- Next by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] Info Request: Looking for alternatives in HA/Load balancing firewalls that are also scalable and modular. . .
- Previous by thread: RE: [fw-wiz] Info Request: Looking for alternatives in HA/Load balancing firewallsthat are also scalable and modular. . .
- Next by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] Info Request: Looking for alternatives in HA/Load balancing firewallsthat are also scalable and modular. . .
- Index(es):