Re: [fw-wiz] Assessment Of GoToMyPC vs. Network Security
- From: "Brian Loe" <knobdy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 15:51:48 -0500
On 4/7/06, Jim Seymour <jseymour@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nice in theory. Doesn't appear to work in practice. We have, for
example, employees that must be able to add new WLANs when they're on
the road. Lack of "Administrator" access apparently precludes this.
Ran into another one today. Volo View (an AutoCAD viewer application)
insists on trying to modify the system registry. So if the end-user
doesn't have "Admin," or at least "Power User," rights: No go. The
list goes on and on. Suffice it to say, we tried, we really, really
tried (and we're still trying) to limit end-user access as much as
possible. But success has proven elusive. (Note: I'm not the 'doze
guru. I'm going by what little I know and what those who are supposed
to know tell me.)
Jim
What's wrong with Power User only?
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- References:
- Re: [fw-wiz] Assessment Of GoToMyPC vs. Network Security
- From: Paul D. Robertson
- Re: [fw-wiz] Assessment Of GoToMyPC vs. Network Security
- From: Jim Seymour
- Re: [fw-wiz] Assessment Of GoToMyPC vs. Network Security
- Prev by Date: RE: [fw-wiz] Info Request: Looking for alternatives in HA/Load balancing firewalls that are also scalable and modular. . .
- Next by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] the infamous "static" versus "nat"
- Previous by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] Assessment Of GoToMyPC vs. Network Security
- Next by thread: Fwd: [fw-wiz] Assessment Of GoToMyPC vs. Network Security
- Index(es):