[fw-wiz] the infamous "static" versus "nat"
- From: Vahid Pazirandeh <vpaziran@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 11:02:23 -0700 (PDT)
Hi All. Great mail list btw, thanks to everyones input.
Two basic questions.
1. I've heard the convention of using "static" for low-to-high NATing and
"nat/global" for high-to-low. Why?
2. Would someone explain the underlying differences in these two commands? Do
they achieve the same thing? Assume net1 = 10.1.1.0/24, net2 = 10.2.2.0/24.
A. static (net1, net2) 10.1.1.0 10.1.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
B. static (net2, net1) 10.2.2.0 10.2.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
"Make it better before you make it faster."
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
firewall-wizards mailing list
- Prev by Date: [fw-wiz] PIX 501 outgoing SMTP problem - (reset-o)
- Next by Date: [fw-wiz] LayerOne 2006 - Finalized Speaker Line-Up Announced
- Previous by thread: [fw-wiz] PIX 501 outgoing SMTP problem - (reset-o)
- Next by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] the infamous "static" versus "nat"