Re: [fw-wiz] X server in a Firewall
- From: Carson Gaspar <carson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 02:07:48 -0500
--On Tuesday, January 24, 2006 10:23 PM -0500 "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Paul D. Robertson wrote:Indeed, that's why console-only access is the best method.
Indeed; if your firewall rulesets change so often that you find it onerous to walk down the hall to the console, then your firewall ruleset is changing too often, which probably means you are already in a state of screwed.
Or "down the hall" involves a 13 hour flight to Tokyo...if you're lucky. If not, you might have to transfer to go to a branch office.
And no, I'm not exaggerating. Of course, more folks work for slightly smaller companies... ;-)
-- Carson _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- References:
- [fw-wiz] X server in a Firewall
- From: John M
- Re: [fw-wiz] X server in a Firewall
- From: Paul D. Robertson
- Re: [fw-wiz] X server in a Firewall
- From: Marcus J. Ranum
- [fw-wiz] X server in a Firewall
- Prev by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] RE: IDS (was: FW appliance comparison)
- Next by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] X server in a Firewall
- Previous by thread: RE: [fw-wiz] X server in a Firewall
- Next by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] X server in a Firewall
- Index(es):