Re: [fw-wiz] X server in a Firewall
- From: John M <idm.john@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 19:57:45 -0800 (PST)
> Are you trying to say that a dumb idea is less
> dumb if it's a FORTUNE 500's dumb idea?
I just mean a complex network. A Fortune 500 has a
more complex network than ACME Corporation and a
Fortune 100 has a more complex network than a Fortune
500 and surely Bush has a more complex network than a
Fortune 100, so to process all that Google logs...
> You know what? I think remote GUI administration
> using
> a bloated bucket of crap like X windows is a dumb
> idea
> no matter whose it is.
But what do you think about a _local_ GUI
administration (via X window) in a firewall?
My question was: what is better (or worse), taking in
account the GUI requeriment: a local X window server
running in the firewall, to be managed localy(that is,
no remote access) or a web server, ssh based system
or another port based in a proprietary protocol, to be
managed remotely?
Or rephrasing the question: which is riskier?
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [fw-wiz] X server in a Firewall
- From: Peter Bruderer
- Re: [fw-wiz] X server in a Firewall
- From: Marcus J. Ranum
- Re: [fw-wiz] X server in a Firewall
- References:
- Re: [fw-wiz] X server in a Firewall
- From: Marcus J. Ranum
- Re: [fw-wiz] X server in a Firewall
- Prev by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] X server in a Firewall
- Next by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] X server in a Firewall
- Previous by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] X server in a Firewall
- Next by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] X server in a Firewall
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|