Re: [fw-wiz] X server in a Firewall
- From: Cat Okita <cat@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 22:53:54 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Marcus J. Ranum wrote:
Indeed; if your firewall rulesets change so often that you find it onerous to walk down the hall to the console, then your firewall ruleset is changing too often, which probably means you are already in a state of screwed.
Down the hall? Must be nice. I'm thinking "to another continent".
Frankly while I agree that firewall management should be done out of band, there are certainly situations where physical access is not a straightforward means of out of band access - and the environment is legitimately dynamic.
cheers! ========================================================================== "A cat spends her life conflicted between a deep, passionate and profound desire for fish and an equally deep, passionate and profound desire to avoid getting wet. This is the defining metaphor of my life right now." _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: [fw-wiz] X server in a Firewall
- From: Ben Nagy
- Re: [fw-wiz] X server in a Firewall
- From: Paul D. Robertson
- RE: [fw-wiz] X server in a Firewall
- References:
- [fw-wiz] X server in a Firewall
- From: John M
- Re: [fw-wiz] X server in a Firewall
- From: Paul D. Robertson
- Re: [fw-wiz] X server in a Firewall
- From: Marcus J. Ranum
- [fw-wiz] X server in a Firewall
- Prev by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] RE: IDS (was: FW appliance comparison)
- Next by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] X server in a Firewall
- Previous by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] X server in a Firewall
- Next by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] X server in a Firewall
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|