Re: [fw-wiz] X server in a Firewall

On 1/24/06, Paul D. Robertson <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, John M wrote:
> Out of band management (i.e. get off your posterior and walk to the
> firewall) is always a winner for me.

Can you elaborate on what you're saying here?

And what's the proxy running on the firewall doing?
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Ports needed for ISA 2004 (DMZ)?
    ... Sorry I didn't understand what entries I would need to put in the firewall ... to cover the reverse NAT scenario you mentioned? ... Can you elaborate on that ...
    (microsoft.public.isa)
  • Re: full control of connections
    ... Can you elaborate? ... TuxGuardian - An application-based firewall ... unable to see security advantages of application-based firewalls over ... To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: FIREWALL FOR ADVANCED USERS?
    ... > firewall with openbsd, ... Can't get any clearer than that; unless you want to get more elaborate? ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: FIREWALL FOR ADVANCED USERS?
    ... >> firewall with openbsd, ... > Maybe if they wanted a more elaborate answer, ... You took the words right out of my mouth... ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: firewall on windows server 2003
    ... >> packet filtering firewall completely independent of ICF ... could you elaborate on this comment please? ... control network access to the machine is less secure than using ICF? ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)