RE: [fw-wiz] Why are developers choosing to...

On Friday, January 20, 2006 1:41 PM, Paul D. Robertson so spake:

>On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Joseph S D Yao wrote:
>> panic recently that their special app on port 7777 was not being
>> through a firewall. Turned out it was a Web app. Grumble.
>I feel your pain.

Hence my original question...

Glad (I suppose) to hear that I'm not alone. Now...What wording do you
use when (if) you inform "vendors" who have coded such web-apps on
non-standard ports? My plea's seem to fall on deaf (or perhaps, dumb)
firewall-wizards mailing list

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Belkin cable router and NIS...
    ... > weren't stepping through port by port!) ... > any Implicit Block firewall events showing in the log? ... > Joseph V. Morris ... > Almost all electrons used in the creation of this message were recycled. ...
  • Re: Morning Watch Smoke; February 28, 2006
    ... Port of St. Joseph, and it's SG #1 in the Cavicchi 2C. ... Listening to ...
  • Re: [fw-wiz] Why are developers choosing to...
    ... > systems where port 443 is already snared by another site. ... Hrrmph. ... host using the virtual IP address, ... panic recently that their special app on port ...