Re: [fw-wiz] Why are developers choosing to...
- From: "Paul D. Robertson" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:41:05 -0500 (EST)
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Joseph S D Yao wrote:
> Hrrmph. Easy enough to use a second, virtual IP address and a virtual
> host using the virtual IP address, in Apache's 'httpd'. Had someone
Sure, but in a hosted situation, that may cost you money. Regular Web
space on a vhost can be down to $3/month, an extra IP can cost you more
each month, or bump you up into the $35/month end of the spectrum.
Plus, Apache might not be set up to do IP-based vhosts.
Name-based virtual hosts are simple, and often people aim for the lowest
common denominator, or they don't have enough admin experience to do more
than that.
> panic recently that their special app on port 7777 was not being allowed
> through a firewall. Turned out it was a Web app. Grumble.
I feel your pain.
Paul
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Robertson "My statements in this message are personal opinions
paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx which may have no basis whatsoever in fact."
http://fora.compuwar.net Infosec discussion boards
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- References:
- Re: [fw-wiz] Why are developers choosing to...
- From: Joseph S D Yao
- Re: [fw-wiz] Why are developers choosing to...
- Prev by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] Why are developers choosing to...
- Next by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] Why are developers choosing to...
- Previous by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] Why are developers choosing to...
- Next by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] Why are developers choosing to...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|