Re: [fw-wiz] Why are developers choosing to...
- From: Joseph S D Yao <jsdy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:40:00 -0500
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 12:30:46PM -0500, Paul D. Robertson wrote:
...
> More than likely a large number of sites are now being hosted on shared
> systems where port 443 is already snared by another site. Combine that
> with the "I can test on a different port" and sprinkle on a little
> obscurity and some level of lesser threat (especially the "worms won't hit
> this" kind) and after you shake it all up, you kind of get what we have.
...
Hrrmph. Easy enough to use a second, virtual IP address and a virtual
host using the virtual IP address, in Apache's 'httpd'. Had someone
panic recently that their special app on port 7777 was not being allowed
through a firewall. Turned out it was a Web app. Grumble.
--
Joe Yao
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is not an official statement of OSIS Center policies.
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [fw-wiz] Why are developers choosing to...
- From: Paul D. Robertson
- Re: [fw-wiz] Why are developers choosing to...
- References:
- [fw-wiz] Why are developers choosing to...
- From: Behm, Jeffrey L.
- Re: [fw-wiz] Why are developers choosing to...
- From: Paul D. Robertson
- [fw-wiz] Why are developers choosing to...
- Prev by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] Why are developers choosing to...
- Next by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] Why are developers choosing to...
- Previous by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] Why are developers choosing to...
- Next by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] Why are developers choosing to...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|