Re: [fw-wiz] Why are developers choosing to...
- From: Greg Spath <gkspath@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:49:12 -0500
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:52:40 -0500
"Adrian Grigorof" <adi@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> One reason on IIS is that you can only have one TCP/443, SSL secured
> website per IP address. Many hosting companies are using "host
> headers" to host several websites with the same IP address.
That is the way SSL works, and is not limited to IIS web servers. You
have to define virtual addresses for any server that hosts several
virtual sites. You need to do this with any reverse proxies as well.
--g
--
Greg Spath <gkspath@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Infrastructure Security Analyst
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- References:
- [fw-wiz] Why are developers choosing to...
- From: Behm, Jeffrey L.
- Re: [fw-wiz] Why are developers choosing to...
- From: Adrian Grigorof
- [fw-wiz] Why are developers choosing to...
- Prev by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum
- Next by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] Why are developers choosing to...
- Previous by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] Why are developers choosing to...
- Next by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] Why are developers choosing to...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|