Re: [fw-wiz] FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum
- From: sai <sonicsai@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:04:45 +0500
On 1/18/06, Paul Melson <pmelson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> Subject: [fw-wiz] FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum
>
> > I'd like to ask the forum for any input (good or bad) on a comparison
> between the Cisco ASA
> > 5510 and the Symantec SGS 5620 ...
> >
> > We're looking to replace our current firewall setup with an appliance type
> approach.
>
(many) appliances tend to be marketing led. I mean, the reasoning
behind developing the products comes from the marketing people rather
than techies. There are vendors out there that will sell you anti-spam
on firewall if you really want all-in-one boxes. Why would you want an
IDS on the same machine as a firewall? Its not going to work. It will
not have enough signatures to give you the sort of security you need.
sai
sai
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [fw-wiz] FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum
- From: Patrick M. Hausen
- Re: [fw-wiz] FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum
- From: Paul D. Robertson
- Re: [fw-wiz] FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum
- References:
- [fw-wiz] FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum
- From: Roy Duperret
- RE: [fw-wiz] FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum
- From: Paul Melson
- [fw-wiz] FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum
- Prev by Date: Re: [fw-wiz] IPTables is not forwarding traffic for PPTP or VNC
- Next by Date: [fw-wiz] RE: PIX v7: routing without NAT
- Previous by thread: RE: [fw-wiz] FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum
- Next by thread: Re: [fw-wiz] FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|