Re: [fw-wiz] The home user problem returns
From: Marcus J. Ranum (mjr_at_ranum.com)
Date: 10/05/05
- Previous message: Stewart, John: "RE: [fw-wiz] The home user problem returns"
- In reply to: Dave Piscitello: "Re: [fw-wiz] The home user problem returns"
- Next in thread: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] The home user problem returns"
- Reply: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] The home user problem returns"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: dave@corecom.com, tbird@precision-guesswork.com Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 13:36:32 -0400
Dave Piscitello wrote:
>If organizations offered tangible (monetary) rewards to incent users to comply with security policy, I suspect you'd see improvements. The model I proposed is similar to performance objectives - set goals, and reward employees with $ at the end of a performance period based on the results of a security audit. I call this the "reverse Cadbury chocolate" premise. Simply put, if people will sell their passwords for a $3 candy bar, will employees
That's a great idea!!! Offer everyone $5k/year less than you normally would
pay them, and give them a $5k bonus at the end of the year if they show
that they've been a "good security camper"!
...and the bean counters would love it because if employees terminated
before the bonus, they just penalized themselves (and saved the company)
$5k! :)
mjr.
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Stewart, John: "RE: [fw-wiz] The home user problem returns"
- In reply to: Dave Piscitello: "Re: [fw-wiz] The home user problem returns"
- Next in thread: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] The home user problem returns"
- Reply: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] The home user problem returns"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
