RE: [fw-wiz] The home user problem returns

From: Bill Royds (
Date: 09/14/05

  • Next message: David Lang: "Re: [fw-wiz] The home user problem returns"
    To: <>
    Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:11:21 -0400

    One of the main problems with MS Operating Systems is that one must run as root
    (administrator) to make it useful since a local user can't even use things like
    USB ports since they require admin privileges to connect. Supposedly Microsoft
    Vista will run as local user by default, but 90% or more of Windows home users
    now run with admin privileges.
      Anyone who has ever administered a Unix shop would shiver if all users were
    running as root be default. Yet that is what most home users are doing.
    Funny enough, Mac OSX does not run as root be default yet people can install
       If Microsoft simply added a patch to XP SP2 to force a password dialogue when
    something was installed or registry changed, we would reduce the virus threat

    -----Original Message-----
    [] On Behalf Of Jim Seymour
    Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 8:51 PM
    Subject: Re: [fw-wiz] The home user problem returns

    Mason Schmitt <> wrote:
    > I don't think people should have to know much about computer security,
    > "security apps" like anti-virus, firewalls, etc. I think that computers
    > should be ubiquitous, non intrusive and largely trustworthy. The
    > problem is that this is so far from current reality as to be easily
    > confused with fantasy.

    As long a companies like Microsoft continue to sell a general purpose
    operating system to the public, much of it poorly thought-out and/or
    poorly designed and/or poorly coded, complete with applications that
    are "designed" with a fine disregard for what those of us with more
    sense regard as "security boundaries," representing it all as an easy,
    user-friendly, maintenance-free "experience," this will not change.


    firewall-wizards mailing list

  • Next message: David Lang: "Re: [fw-wiz] The home user problem returns"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Fork Bombing Patch
      ... if non root user request admin for more number of processes than root ... and if that user is not trustworthy and if does fork bombing attack it ... Perhaps you should file a bug with your distribution if you believe the default settings in limits.conf are too high. ... If we merge this patch, every cracking toolkit in existence will add such a feature, because log spamming makes it harder for the administrator to find more important messages, and even if the administrator uses grep judiciously to filter them out, that doesn't help if logrotate has already deleted the log containing the information they need to keep /var/log from filling up. ...
    • Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Re: Any update on SSH brute force attempts?
      ... > restore, ... root user in this case rather than a separate local user just means one less ... thing to maintain - you always have a local root anyway. ... Local tty access may be a 3 hour drive to the datacenter. ...
    • RE: root
      ... I tried to hit F8 when the comp started up. ... administrator on my comp. ... On this credit card account, that I accessed tonight, it ... As far as root goes, I was also just wondering if there is ...
    • Re: root password setting unoffered at install
      ... Since, with RBAC you can't by mistake do "rm -rf /" and delete your own machine if you are currently active with the "printer administrator" role, for example. ... Whereas with the way SUDO is configured on Ubuntu, ... It is roughly equivalent to having a root user... ...
    • Re: theoretical question - can roots username be changed?
      ... If everyone in the Linux world knows that the chance is good ... >>>that there is a user called 'root' on any given Linux box, ... >>whatever the system administrator wants it to be. ...