RE: [fw-wiz] The home user problem returns
From: Jim Seymour (jseymour_at_linxnet.com)
Date: 09/14/05
- Previous message: Marcus J. Ranum: "RE: [fw-wiz] The home user problem returns"
- In reply to: Brian Loe: "RE: [fw-wiz] The home user problem returns"
- Next in thread: Mason Schmitt: "Re: [fw-wiz] The home user problem returns"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:18:48 -0400 (EDT)
"Brian Loe" <knobdy@stjoelive.com> wrote:
[snip]
>
> I think you're wrong. I don't think an ISP should baby-sit anymore than I
> think the government should. We are all responsible for our own actions.
> That's life. Its called personal responsibility and I support it
> wholeheartedly.
[snip]
Baby-sit? I agree: No, they should not. But the ISP *is* providing
the transport to the 'net. If they detect or are informed of abuse
coming out of their space, I believe they have a responsibility to stop
transporting that abuse.
Jim
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Marcus J. Ranum: "RE: [fw-wiz] The home user problem returns"
- In reply to: Brian Loe: "RE: [fw-wiz] The home user problem returns"
- Next in thread: Mason Schmitt: "Re: [fw-wiz] The home user problem returns"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|