RE: [fw-wiz] The home user problem returns

From: Tina Bird (tbird_at_precision-guesswork.com)
Date: 09/13/05

  • Next message: R. DuFresne: "Re: [fw-wiz] The home user problem returns"
    To: "'Mason Schmitt'" <mason@schmitt.ca>, "'R. DuFresne'" <dufresne@sysinfo.com>
    Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:23:33 -0700
    
    

    > It seems that there are two primary ways in which people
    > change. Either
    > they make a conscious choice to change prior to a problem
    > getting out of
    > hand (requires knowledge that there is an impending problem and
    > knowledge of how to avoid the problem) or they endure more
    > and more pain
    > until they are forced to look at the problem and finally make
    > a choice.

    i disagree. i don't know *anyone* who willingly makes a fundamental,
    significant change in their behavior without pain as a motivator. for every
    example of your first category that you can present, i can *probably*
    demonstrate that the "apparent" change is really an example of the person
    behaving consistently with some deeper part of their personality, which
    isn't changing.

    i think it's human nature to resist change altogether unless some sort of
    pain - personal, physical, financial - motivates them. it's why carrot and
    stick works so well as a way to influence behavior.

    so for me, the question is, how do we influence the *consequences* of badly
    configured or managed machines - wherever they are, on corporate networks or
    the internet - in order to create the change we want? how do we create a
    beneficial sort of pain?

    when i'm dealing with my relatives, i just change the configuration of their
    computer when i'm visiting. that's not exactly a motivator, but hey, their
    machines are fully patched :-)

    it's why i'm so interested in NAC and NAP and other sorts of enterprise
    technologies that let me use network connectivity as the bribe to get
    machines configured the way i want them. i'm creating pain for the end user
    by not letting them get to the web without doing what i want - the height of
    security admin arrogance, i'm sure, but i try to be reasonable in my
    expectations.

    cheers - tbird

    _______________________________________________
    firewall-wizards mailing list
    firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards


  • Next message: R. DuFresne: "Re: [fw-wiz] The home user problem returns"

    Relevant Pages

    • RE: [fw-wiz] The home user problem returns
      ... threshold of individual 'pain' differs with each End user. ... beneficial sort of pain? ... when i'm dealing with my relatives, i just change the configuration of their ... machines are fully patched :-) ...
      (Firewall-Wizards)
    • Re: What does it mean for a machine to understand something?
      ... Machines. ... There is a practical meaning to "understanding". ... Yet it also means that to be fully cognizant of what blue is, ... Just like an experience of pain is necessary to be fully ...
      (comp.ai.philosophy)
    • Re: HijackThis Log Help
      ... The point is that if we teach people that we can mostly clean their ... machines, that it's good enough, and they don't feel the "pain", not ... Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: [fw-wiz] The home user problem returns
      ... >> significant change in their behavior without pain as a motivator. ... as a reward system for proper configuration, ... artificial ignorance approach to log management, or good ol' deny all firewall ... so of *course* most folks won't want to do that. ...
      (Firewall-Wizards)
    • Re: SF: Doctor Frankensteins great grandson
      ... What are the machines if they are not computers? ... and what unitss are these *very precise measurements ... So, the pain of losing a parent is the same as stubbing a toe, only ...
      (talk.origins)