Re: [fw-wiz] Windows VPN/RRAS traffic through watchguard

From: Chuck Swiger (chuck_at_codefab.com)
Date: 09/01/05

  • Next message: Martin: "Re: [fw-wiz] firewall rule lifecycle management"
    To: Danny <nocmonkey@gmail.com>
    Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 20:02:11 -0400
    
    

    Danny wrote:
    > Now, a VPN "connection" is established from the Internet into the ISA
    > server without a problem, however VPN traffic through the tunnel does
    > not work most of the time. It's inconsistent but primarily does not
    > work.
    >
    > So, now I try without the Watchguard in the picture, and the tunnel
    > carries traffic just fine - as it should.
    >
    > Has anyone ever experience such a problem?

    Are you using NAT? If so, you'll need to use a UDP-based system, and/or assign
    unique TCP port numbers to each distinct connection. Otherwise, you'll
    probably be limited to only having one VPN session active at a time.

    Are you passing GRE through? I recently had to deal with a similar situation
    involving Cisco's VPN hardware and their VPN client, and the following helps:

    redirect_proto gre routerIP
    redirect_port udp routerIP:500 500
    redirect_port udp routerIP:4500 4500
    redirect_port udp routerIP:62515 62515
    redirect_port tcp routerIP:10000 10000
    redirect_port tcp routerIP:pptp pptp

    Replace routerIP with your ISA server's IP. YMMV.

    -- 
    -Chuck
    _______________________________________________
    firewall-wizards mailing list
    firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
    

  • Next message: Martin: "Re: [fw-wiz] firewall rule lifecycle management"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: VPN versus Terminal Server for remote workers
      ... If one wants to cross the river and gets into a secure tunnel, ... this does not really help me understand why the hardware will allow ... By default and intention 'split tunneling' of VPN connections is not ... as far as using Term Server, the question really is: ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: RV042 - Does anyone understand it? Documentation?
      ... if one is using an RV042 for VPN, then what affect does the routing table have on the VPN packets? ... When the packet is received at the other end of the tunnel, it will still be destined for a "foreign" private subnet. ... In other words the range of IP's you are trying to reach and the range of IP's the traffic is coming from MUST be included in the subnets for the encrypted tunnel. ...
      (comp.dcom.vpn)
    • Re: 30 minute logon time - This is a rough one
      ... figure out what the issue is with UDP and kerberos at this site. ... nightmare with some our VPN locations. ... If the MTU size for the circuit has ... Setting the kerberos tcp fix I mentioned earlier plus tweaking the MTU size ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
    • Re: L2TP mit IPSec Verbindungsprobleme
      ... DSL-Router an einen VPN Server zu senden. ... Ich habe bereits Portforwarding von Port 500 für IKE und Port ... Du brauchst nur UDP/500 und ESP (das ist ein eignes IP Protokoll wie UDP, ... TCP und ICMP mit der Nummer 50). ...
      (de.comp.security.firewall)
    • Re: ISA VPN Accessing Mapped Drives
      ... Exactly how are these applied to the ISA policies you created for the VPN ... 139 TCP ... 53 UDP ...
      (microsoft.public.isa.vpn)