[fw-wiz] Layer 2 firewalls ...
From: Andrew K. Adams (akadams_at_psc.edu)
Date: 08/29/05
- Previous message: Chris Hunhoff: "RE: [fw-wiz] UPS Worldship connection problems with new firewall device"
- Next in thread: Paul Melson: "RE: [fw-wiz] Layer 2 firewalls ..."
- Reply: Paul Melson: "RE: [fw-wiz] Layer 2 firewalls ..."
- Reply: Dale W. Carder: "Re: [fw-wiz] Layer 2 firewalls ..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 14:26:02 -0400
Is anyone aware of any *disadvantages* of layer 2 firewalls?
Current marketing seems to be pushing layer 2 firewalls mostly, as far as I
can tell, to reduce the possibility of the device being compromised (no ip
address.) And it seems to me, that any network using a media of Ethernet
could (and should?) be doing this, unless of course, they needed the device
to perform layer 3 or 4 utility (e.g., NAT), additionally.
I readily admit that I don't possess "link layer" expertise, and thus, I
suspect that I must be missing something further, if layer 2 firewalls are
indeed a trade-off.
Thanks!
-aka
-- Andrew K. Adams Pittsburgh GigaPoP & Network Research Group Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center Office: 306-A Mellon Institute Carnegie Mellon University Phone: (412) 268-5142 4400 Fifth Ave. Fax: (412) 268-8200 Pittsburgh, PA 15213 WWW: http://www.psc.edu/~akadams/ D3 FA 7D 61 FD ED BD D9 0C DE 94 DB 0F 25 D0 2E _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Chris Hunhoff: "RE: [fw-wiz] UPS Worldship connection problems with new firewall device"
- Next in thread: Paul Melson: "RE: [fw-wiz] Layer 2 firewalls ..."
- Reply: Paul Melson: "RE: [fw-wiz] Layer 2 firewalls ..."
- Reply: Dale W. Carder: "Re: [fw-wiz] Layer 2 firewalls ..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|