Re: [fw-wiz] Internet accessible screened subnet - use public orprivateIPs?
From: Dale W. Carder (dwcarder_at_doit.wisc.edu)
Date: 07/28/05
- Previous message: R. DuFresne: "RE: [fw-wiz] Internet accessible screened subnet - use public orprivateIPs?"
- In reply to: lordchariot_at_earthlink.net: "RE: [fw-wiz] Internet accessible screened subnet - use public orprivateIPs?"
- Next in thread: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] Internet accessible screened subnet - use public orprivate IPs?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: lordchariot@earthlink.net Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:22:11 -0500
Thus spake lordchariot@earthlink.net (lordchariot@earthlink.net) on Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 08:12:58PM -0400:
>
> What about when IPv6 becomes predominant on the net?
I wouldn't worry about this too much for businesses in the US.
> Am I mistaken that there doesn't seem to be any concept of NAT in the IPv6
> specs?
The idea of ipng was to learn from our mistakes.
However, either 1) NAT for ipv6 will be created, 2) PI address space becomes
a reality, or 3) an elegant to deal with hosts w/ multiple addresses bound to
an interface. Any of those is a long ways off at this point.
You may be interested in reading:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-nap-01.txt
Dale
----------------------------------
Dale W. Carder - Network Engineer
University of Wisconsin at Madison
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: R. DuFresne: "RE: [fw-wiz] Internet accessible screened subnet - use public orprivateIPs?"
- In reply to: lordchariot_at_earthlink.net: "RE: [fw-wiz] Internet accessible screened subnet - use public orprivateIPs?"
- Next in thread: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] Internet accessible screened subnet - use public orprivate IPs?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
