RE: [fw-wiz] Internet accessible screened subnet - use public orprivateIPs?

From: R. DuFresne (dufresne_at_sysinfo.com)
Date: 07/28/05

  • Next message: Dale W. Carder: "Re: [fw-wiz] Internet accessible screened subnet - use public orprivateIPs?"
    To: lordchariot@earthlink.net
    Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:05:38 -0400 (EDT)
    
    

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1

    On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 lordchariot@earthlink.net wrote:

    >
    > What about when IPv6 becomes predominant on the net?
    > Am I mistaken that there doesn't seem to be any concept of NAT in the IPv6
    > specs?
    > I could be wrong, but thought I found that somewhere?
    >

    NATs not the issue with IPv6, retirement will have happened for all here
    long before this happens by all appearances.

    Thanks,

    Ron DuFresne
    - --
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
             admin & senior security consultant: sysinfo.com
                             http://sysinfo.com
    Key fingerprint = 9401 4B13 B918 164C 647A E838 B2DF AFCC 94B0 6629

    ...We waste time looking for the perfect lover
    instead of creating the perfect love.

                     -Tom Robbins <Still Life With Woodpecker>
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

    iD8DBQFC6AU2st+vzJSwZikRAljkAKDb/QV8xtkwh49zRuLHpx/MqeOKVwCfY3QQ
    pkhxy6GjBVGRvsq38JJYo4k=
    =fRtw
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    _______________________________________________
    firewall-wizards mailing list
    firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards


  • Next message: Dale W. Carder: "Re: [fw-wiz] Internet accessible screened subnet - use public orprivateIPs?"